Why all those models
Research, short-term insights, long-term foundation.
Abundance of demographic and socioeconomic data together with real human trips measurements enable projecting the real data into a durable, data-rich
foundation to model behavior across time, demography, and geography. Together the models deliver both immediacy and depth.
Operational speed
OOH impression dashboards deliver immediate OOH planning and performance insights.
Unprecedented realism
Agent-based model stems from latest advancements in population modelling and sheer data availability.
Behavioral depth
Activity-based model captures the human context behind exposure, beyond traffic counts.
Strategic continuity
Both systems align to the same OOH measurement language and outputs.
Roadmap
Converging toward unified measurement.
The ABM roadmap shifts us from a respondent-weighted view of mobility towards a full-population simulation with stronger validation and much richer audience segmentation,
while the respondents trips remains the workhorse for live operational delivery. We begun with a disciplined data inventory, bringing together national statistics on population
and economic activity alongside traffic intensity models and related mobility layers. That foundation lets us move from “what we measured” to “what plausibly happens everywhere”,
with clear traceability back to observed evidence.
Using previously measured trips from around 6,000 people, we built an OOH impressions calculator that does more than aggregate counts. It takes individuals and their journeys and
expands them into full visualisations where agents traverse OOH visibility zones, allowing impressions to be estimated in a spatially and temporally realistic way. Critically, those
measured trips are not treated merely as weighting factors. They are behavioural anchors: signals about routines, constraints, preferences, and context that we preserve and generalise
rather than smoothing away.
On top of this, we constructed a highly realistic synthetic population, locating homes, workplaces, schools, and—where relevant—holiday homes, and anchoring those agents across Sweden
with plausible geographies and household structures. We then used the measured trips to build a hierarchy of planning: first a “type of week” driven by the person and household profile,
with shocks such as holidays and festivities; then archetypal day-of-week patterns tailored to the individual; and finally an intraday plan. This is where the model becomes recognisably
human: the early start to escort children before work, the evening trip to the pub, the habitual cycle commute, or the Thursday departure to a lakeside holiday home to telework in
quieter surroundings.
These behaviours are not hand-waving. They are grounded in extensive published research on human activity patterns and in our own inference of trip purpose from the measured data, including semantic segmentation of trips to identify likely reasons for travel. The result is an exceptionally robust population model whose uses extend well beyond OOH measurement: it provides a general-purpose behavioural substrate for policy testing, scenario analysis, and any application where realistic activity, movement, and exposure need to be simulated at population scale.
Human Layer
ABM reporting
Live dashboards
OOH impressions